Fanday vs Richmond
Live Type TesterLoading fonts…
Size: 36px
Fanday
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Richmond
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog
Pack my box with five dozen liquor jugs
0123456789 !@#$%^&*()
Glyph Comparison
Fanday
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Richmond
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Fanday | Richmond |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Handwritten | Handwritten |
| Designer | Unknown | Agung Rohmat |
| File Formats | OTF, TTF | WOFF, WOFF2, OTF, TTF |
| Glyph Count | 221 | 347 |
| Downloads | 4 | 2 |
| Latin Support | Yes | Yes |
| Cyrillic Support | No | No |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Fanday or Richmond?
The choice between Fanday and Richmond depends on your project goals. Both fonts share stylistic similarities but differ in character and mood. Review the live comparison above to see which fits your design.
When should I use Fanday vs Richmond?
Use Fanday when you need a strong handwritten feel in headings, branding, or editorial layouts. Compare both side-by-side on FontsWiki to decide which fits your typography system.
Are Fanday and Richmond free to download?
Yes — both Fanday and Richmond are available as free font downloads on FontsWiki. You can download either font in OTF, TTF, or WOFF/WOFF2 formats. Always review the individual font license for commercial usage terms.